Strymon White Papers - news from the lab


Amplifier Tremolo Technology White Paper

Posted by Ethan

Flint Tremolo & ReverbSometimes to understand who you are, you have to go back to the beginning, back to where it all began. Before smart phones, before computers, before integrated circuits and the transistor—the only effects available to guitarists were tremolo and spring reverb. The guitar players of the day didn’t have the rainbow of colors that we have now.

But like a charcoal sketch, there is a stark beauty to the tone without the wash of effects that are now possible. Stripped down to the bare necessities, the contrast of the different tremolos becomes apparent. You feel the beating heart of the photo trem, the rolling waves of the tube trem and the hypnotic swirl of the harmonic tremolo.

Given the storied history of these circuits found within classic amplifiers of the 1960s, there was no doubt that we wanted to develop a studio-class pedal that faithfully delivers three of these iconic and unmistakable tremolo effects. We examined the sonic complexities and tonal interplay, and accounted for every last detail in our hand-crafted algorithms.

The result is the technology found in Flint Tremolo & Reverb. Pete Celi, our Lead DSP Engineer and Sound Designer illustrates the research and sound design process in the White Paper below.

 

Strymon Amplifier Tremolo Technology White Paper

Amplifier Tremolo Overview

Still incorrectly labeled as ‘vibrato’ in many cases, the tremolo effect is a cyclical amplitude (volume) modulation of the input signal. Although there are many cool tremolo effects that can be had by using a simple VCA (voltage-controlled amplifier) circuit and applying geometric waveforms (like sine, triangle, square, ramp) to modulate the amplitude, our interest is in exploring the unique, soothing, pulsing, hypnotic effect that comes out of vintage amplifier tremolo circuits.

There were three main variations that came about in the late ’50s and ’60s. The three types can be referred to as Harmonic Tremolo, Power Tube Tremolo, and Photocell Tremolo. These variations have unique characteristics that result from the very different ways that the effect is achieved

The LFO

One thing that these vintage trem types share in common is the LFO (low frequency oscillator) circuitry, which is generated by a classic positive feedback ‘phase-shift’ oscillator. A network of resistors and capacitors determine the rate of oscillation, and the resultant LFO signal is a mildly distorted sinusoidal signal.

FIG. 1 PHASE-SHIFT OSCILLATOR
FIG. 1 PHASE-SHIFT OSCILLATOR

 

As the LFO circuitry is common to all three trem types under investigation, we can see that LFO waveshape is not responsible for the very different sounds that result from the three implementations. Let’s look closer at the three types.

Harmonic Tremolo

The Harmonic Trem is actually not a pure tremolo effect. It is really a dual-band filtering effect that alternately emphasizes low and high frequencies. The end-result is a soothing pulse that has shades of a mild phaser effect combined with tremolo due to the nature of the frequency bands that are alternated. This circuit required two tubes to create a two-phase differential LFO that controls the gain of the two frequency bands, and then another tube to sum the two bands together. This implementation had a rather short period of availability perhaps due to the somewhat ‘expensive’ implementation. The basic idea is shown below:

FIG. 2 HARMONIC TREMOLO BLOCK DIAGRAM
FIG. 2 HARMONIC TREMOLO BLOCK DIAGRAM

 

One phase of the LFO signal is added directly with the low-band input signal, while the other phase gets added directly to the high-band signal. Essentially, the filtered signal ‘rides’ on top of the LFO signal on its way into the tube summing amplifier. This effectively changes the small-signal operating point of the filtered signal along the tube gain curve. When the LFO signal is at low voltages, the filtered signal will have more gain as the tube operates in its steepest gain region. Conversely, when the LFO is at higher voltages, the tube gain-curve flattens out, and the input signal experiences reduced gain. Since the two bands have opposite phase LFO signals, when one band is experiencing high gain, the other is experiencing low gain. When the two are combined, the opposite phase LFO signals cancel each other out, and the two alternating amplitude-modulated filtered signals comprise the output. This produces the tremolo effect of hearing a loud (bright) signal alternating with a soft (dark) signal.

Also, as a consequence of riding up and down the tube’s gain curve, the filtered signals experience slight changes in harmonic content due to the changing nonlinearities of the gain curve around the signal. This adds further complexity to the trem’s sound.

Power Tube Tremolo

Next in line was a more cost effective circuit that eliminated two tubes from the Harmonic Trem implementation. It used the LFO signal (no longer a two-phase LFO) to directly influence the power tube bias of the push-pull output stage.

FIG. 3 POWER TUBE TREMOLO BLOCK DIAGRAM
FIG. 3 POWER TUBE TREMOLO BLOCK DIAGRAM

 

In a push-pull power amplifier, two tubes are employed and biased so that they idle at substantially less than full power. This keeps power dissipation to a minimum when no signal is going through the amp, allowing them to provide power to the speaker more efficiently while increasing tube life. The guitar signal is split into opposite phases so that one tube conducts when the signal is positive, and the other tube conducts when the signal is negative. The two outputs are added together through the output transformer.

By applying the LFO to the bias, the power tubes are being biased into lower and higher idle currents. At low idle currents, the tubes are shutting off and signal gain (volume) is reduced. At higher currents, the tubes are running hot and higher gain results. This alternating gain produces the tremolo effect.

But there is more going on than just a change in volume. Secondary effects coming into play are crossover distortion as the tremolo volume heads towards zero and the tubes are shutting off. At the other end, increased power tube harmonic distortion occurs as the tremolo nears its maximum volume. The effects of power-supply sag also contributes to some of the dynamic response when playing through this kind of tremolo circuit, as it influences the relative bias point of the power tubes. All these things add up to contribute to the ‘magic’ of this trem circuit.

Photocell Tremolo

The Photocell tremolo uses a light-dependent resistor (LDR) to attenuate the input signal. The LDR is coupled with a miniature light bulb that is connected to the LFO. As the LFO oscillates, the bulb gets brighter and dimmer which in turn varies the resistance of the LDR. The varying resistance works with other circuit impedances to change the signal level.

FIG. 4 PHOTOCELL TREMOLO BLOCK DIAGRAM
FIG. 4 PHOTOCELL TREMOLO BLOCK DIAGRAM

 

The light element used in the classic photo-trem circuits in the 60s was a neon bulb which has a very fast response time, meaning it turns on and off very quickly and spends very little time in between. This produces a characteristic ‘hard’ sounding tremolo that is moving between two levels, almost like a square wave. The duty cycle (symmetry) of the tremolo depends on the characteristics of the bulb relative to the LFO voltages, but the classic Photo-trem circuits were tuned to spend most of their time at the higher output level (duty cycle >>50%, bulb is ‘off’), switching to the lower level only briefly during the cycle. At maximum intensity, a choppy trem results.

Also, as the photocell trem circuit is not buffered, the tremolo creates a varying load resistance in the signal path as the bulb changes the resistance of the LDR. This in turn has secondary effects on the signal’s frequency response that contribute subtle characteristics as well.

Capturing the Magic

We can see from the discussions above that the end result of these vintage tremolo circuits is much more than a simple cyclical volume fluctuation. The depth, warmth and overall vibe of each one of these tremolo types can only be created by giving consideration to the entire circuitry used in the process. For the harmonic tremolo, the interaction of the LFO with the input signal in relation to the preamp tube’s operating characteristics must be accounted for. The Power-tube tremolo must recreate the vintage push-pull power tube section including the phase-splitter, tube characteristics, and power supply considerations. The photocell trem must involve the proper bulb-LDR characteristics in relation to the LFO signal, along with secondary consideration of variable loading in the signal path. When these things are all properly accounted for, the difference from a simple VCA tremolo is apparent. The complex and subtle nuances come to life, producing the mojo of their vintage amp brethren.




Flint Reverb Summary Paper – Three Classic Reverb Types

Posted by Ethan

Flint Tremolo & ReverbThe magical combination of tremolo and reverb is the earliest example of a perfect guitar effects marriage. Our new Flint Tremolo & Reverb pedal delivers three classic tremolo circuits, along with three completely unique and complimentary reverb types.

You get the classic ’60s Spring Tank Reverb, the inventive ’70s Electronic Plate Reverb, and the nostalgic ’80s Hall Rack Reverb. Pete Celi, our Lead DSP Engineer and Sound Designer illustrates the research and sound design process that went into creating our reverbs in Flint.

 

Flint Reverb Summary Paper – Three Classic Reverb Types

The ’60s Combo Amp Spring Tank

The full-size 2-spring tank was commonly used in vintage amps, and it continues its popularity today for its classic tones. The 2-spring tank uses spring segments of differing delay times (a function of the mass and tension of the spring), which adds to the complexity of the sound and smooths out the time and frequency response of the reverb. Contributing greatly to the sound are the input (driving) and output (recovery) tube circuits. These circuits are designed to reduce low-end boominess and to minimize coupling of the low- frequency cabinet resonance into the tank. The high frequencies roll off naturally due to the limits of the spring’s ability to transmit the shorter wavelengths of the higher frequencies.

FIG. 1 SPRING TANK REVERB
FIG. 1 SPRING TANK REVERB

 

The signal from the driving circuit drives a coil which in turn produces a fluctuating magnetic field that moves a magnet attached to the spring. This results in a twisting wave that travels down the spring. The time it takes for the wave to travel down the spring is a function of frequency, with lower frequency waves traveling down the spring more quickly than higher frequencies. This accounts for the ‘drippy’ or ‘boingy’ sound that the reverb produces when given a percussive attack. At the other end of the spring, the signal is recovered by the inverse process which includes coils, magnets, and a recovery circuit. In addition to being recovered, the wave will continue to reflect back and forth along the spring, creating a wash of reverberation that evolves in time due to the frequency-dependent delay times of the spring. The length of time that the reverb lasts when given an impulsive input is known as the ‘decay time’, which is controlled by physical dampers that absorb energy from the spring.

At low mix levels, the 2-spring tank adds a depth and dimension to the sound. Generally speaking, the 2-spring combo-amp reverbs tend to sound a bit less splashy and trashy than their 3-spring stand-alone counterparts at the extremes, but add a full, integrated explosion of sound when cranked up.

The ’70s Electronic Reverb

During the 1970s, digital electronic systems advanced to the point where high-quality real-time electronic reverberation was possible. A single memory chip was capable of storing 1024 bits, and the possibilities seemed endless. The most famous early electronic reverb was a $20,000 plate-style reverb that used eighty(!) of these memory chips. The amazing hardware-based algorithm used multiple delay- lines configured in parallel, with each delay featuring multiple output taps and filtered feedback paths.

FIG. 2 SIMPLIFIED ELECTRONIC PLATE REVERB STRUCTURE
FIG. 2 SIMPLIFIED ELECTRONIC PLATE REVERB STRUCTURE

 

The lengths of the delay lines and individual taps were derived mathematically to produce the most natural reverberation. The reverb algorithm also employed modulation by mixing various taps under internal control to create changes in reflection phases to further reduce undesirable resonances and add depth. The result is a rich, smooth reverb with a quick build-up in density due to the summation of the many parallel output taps.

The ’80s Hall Studio Rack Reverb

By the late ’80s, continued advances in digital ICs and microprocessors lead to (relatively) low-cost digital reverbs that could run many different reverb algorithms and allowed for preset storage and deep parameter editing. Cost sensitivity and the limited available processing power of the day led to the necessary invention of efficient algorithms with minimized computational and memory requirements. To create a Hall-style reverb, a well-practiced technique was to create an early reflections section that fed into a late reverb generator.

FIG. 2 SIMPLIFIED '80s HALL REVERB
FIG. 3 SIMPLIFIED ’80s HALL REVERB

 

A simple multi-tapped delay line was sufficient to create early reflections. The late reverberation was accomplished by a regenerating ‘series-loop’ of delays, all-pass filters, and low-pass filters. Inputs could be injected into the loop in more than one place, and the outputs might consist of the summation of several points from the loop. Delay-line modulation was employed to reduce artifacts and achieve a smoother, more pleasing decay. These hall reverbs have a signature sound of distinctive early reflections followed by the slowly-building density of the late reverberation. The modulation adds an increased sense of warmth and depth.

Enter the World of Flint

The three reverb types in Flint pay homage to these three classic reverb sounds. While not focusing on any specific recreation, these classics served as philosophical and sonic guides in the creation of our ’60s, ’70s and ’80s reverb types.




Rotary Speaker Technology White Paper

Posted by Ethan

Lex RotaryWhen we decided to create a studio-class pedal that faithfully recreates the classic, unmistakable sound of the most sought-after rotating speaker system, we prepared to study every nuance.

Our sound design labs have been filled with those signature, swirling, three-dimensional sounds, as we painstakingly analyzed and recreated the physics and mechanics behind these systems.

The result is our rotating speaker technology found in Lex Rotary. Pete Celi, our Lead DSP Engineer and Sound Designer illustrates the research and sound design process in the White Paper below. Check it out!

Strymon Rotary Speaker Technology

Rotary Speaker Overview

Classic rotary speaker systems consist of a spinning horn for the high frequencies, and a rotating drum fed by a separate driver for the low frequencies. There are typically two motor speeds, slow and fast, which are also referred to as chorale and tremolo. These systems were originally designed for use with electric organs, but guitar players soon wanted in on the fun.

FIG 1. SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF LESLIE® TWIN-ROTOR SPEAKER SYSTEM

Rotary speaker systems create dimension and depth when rotating slowly, while generating controlled chaos when spinning at fast speeds. While simple vibrato or chorus effects can create a “poor man’s rotary” sound, a dedicated DSP implementation is required for an accurate reproduction of the many varied aspects responsible for this classic sound. Successful DSP implementation requires a comprehensive study of the physical acoustic phenomena that occur in these rotary speaker systems. Some of the key processes are discussed below.

Horn

The most identifiable effect that a rotary speaker system imparts is the pitch fluctuations known as the Doppler effect. This is a result of the horn’s movement relative to the listener, in the same way a siren appears to change pitch when a fire engine passes by.

FIG 2. THE DOPPLER EFFECT FOR A MOVING SOUND SOURCE

Since the speaker makes the same movement cyclically, the pitch fluctuations occur cyclically also. This is why a traditional vibrato or chorus is sometimes substituted for a rotary effect.

FIG 3. DOPPLER EFFECT OF ROTATING HORN SPEAKER

However, the Doppler effect as produced by a horn spinning inside a cabinet is much more complicated than what is produced by a simple chorus or vibrato effect. As the horn spins, the sound waves from the horn reflect off the interior surfaces of the speaker cabinet, with each of these surfaces experiencing its own Doppler effect before creating secondary reflections on to other surfaces. The sound that emanates from the cabinet to the listener (or microphone) is a complex combination of the horn’s direct sound and the many reflections.

FIG 4. DOPPLER EFFECT AND MULTIPLE REFLECTIONS INSIDE ROTARY SPEAKER CABINET

The spinning horn also produces amplitude and frequency response variations throughout its rotation. As expected, the horn’s direct signal is loudest and brightest when facing the listener, and softer and duller when facing away. These aspects also come into play in determining the nature of the many reflection signals.

Drum

The typical drum configuration is a downward-firing speaker projecting into a rotating cylinder that has a rectangular cutout. An electronic crossover circuit limits the bandwidth of the speaker such that only low frequencies are projected into the drum. As the cylinder spins and the cutout revolves, a pulsing amplitude modulation (tremolo) effect is produced for the lower frequencies. The phase of the amplitude-modulated signal also changes as the cutout moves across and to the rear of the cabinet. The resultant sound produced by the drum is hypnotic and has a “breathing” quality to it.

FIG 5. THE LOW-FREQUENCY BASS ROTOR

Miking

The classic approach to capturing the movement of sound involves a pair of mics at the top of the cabinet at the horn and a single mic at the bottom to pick up the drum. As the mics are moved closer to the cabinet, the amplitude fluctuations caused by the inverse square law effect become more pronounced and the horn signal gets a recognizable “choppy” quality at high speeds. Another result of close miking is an enhanced stereo effect that is very noticeable at slow speeds as the horn passes by one mic and then the next. As the mics are moved back, the fluctuations even out, eventually creating the sound that would be heard naturally in the room at a distance from the cabinet.

FIG 6. CLASSIC APPROACH TO LESLIE® CABINET MIKING

Motor speeds, ramping, and braking

In both the tremolo and chorale speeds, the horn spins slightly faster than the drum, so that the resultant sound is much more complex and evolving than if the two were spinning at identical speeds. Additionally, the inertia of the low-frequency drum is much greater than that of the horn, making it more resistant to changes in speed. Thus, while the horn speeds up and slows down rather quickly, the drum takes much longer to reach its speed. Changing speeds is where the “magic” of these systems is most apparent.

Some rotary systems allow for “braking”, which is when the speed of the horn and drum is reduced to zero so there is no more rotation. With the brake applied, the system is just a two-way stationary speaker system. When the brake is released and the systems starts spinning again, the full impact of the complexity of the system unfolds.

Amplifier

The original rotary systems had a tube amplifier built in to drive the speakers. Overdriving the amp creates harmonics that add a new dimension once they are set into motion through the rotating system. This sound is often referred to as the “growl” of a rotary speaker system, and it has become a signature trademark of these systems.

Strymon Rotary Algorithms

In developing the algorithms that produce these unmistakable sounds, we painstakingly analyzed and recreated the physics, mechanics, and intricate processes discussed above.

The horn signal exhibits all the chaotic yet periodic fluctuations inherent in rotary speaker cabinets. The drum signal pulses and breathes. A two-speed motor engine with braking capability controls the independent Horn and Drum processes. The speed ramp-times reflect the drum’s resistance to change and the horn’s light weight. Fast and slow speeds are independently adjustable, and trimming of the acceleration times is allowed for.

Additionally, a variable mic-distance control allows a wide range of sounds, from dramatic close up sweeping and swirling, to more mellow and calming undulations. A tube preamp drive control allows for overdriving the system to create rich harmonic content, with additional control of the Horn level to match your amp’s voicing. All of this without the need to lug around a behemoth cabinet, setting up microphones, worrying about proper microphone placement, and performing costly motor maintenance and cleaning.

*All product names used in this article are trademarks of their respective owners, which are in no way associated or affiliated with Strymon or Damage Control.






 
Strymon Facebook page     Strymon Twitter link     Strymon YouTube link     Strymon Instagram link     Strymon Pinterest link     Strymon RSS link




Learn more about the team. Read More »